Petitioner, an outsourced employee alleging absence issues, filed a writ petition. The Court held that the petitioner is not a direct employee and grievances must be approached via Labour Court.
No relief granted; dismissed with direction to approach Labour Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4237 of 2018
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar Raushan, Son of Kapildeo Yadav, Resident of VillageSarairadh, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunny Anand, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Raushan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar Sr. Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
5 19-12-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Patna are present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4237 of 2018(5) dt.19-12-2023 2/2
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Divyansh/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be granted relief to the petitioner in respect of alleged absence from duty and employment grievance.
Whether the jurisdiction of the Labour Court is the appropriate forum for the petitioner's grievance as he is not a direct employee of the Corporation.
Sanjay Kumar Raushan
The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd.
Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
