Disposed

Shambhu Prasad Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2023CWJC/3259/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge disposed of this writ petition after noting that a previous order directed the authority to consider the petitioners' cases, including granting an age exemption during empanelment, if the process had commenced. No substantive adjudication on the merits was made.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of based on prior direction to consider age exemption case.

Shambhu Prasad Gupta Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3259 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shambhu Prasad Gupta S/o late Dukkha Sah resident of Village- Janta Flat no. 82, Housing Board Colony Barari, District- Bhagalpur.

¶4

Dilip Kumar Jaiswal Son of Suraya Narayan Jaiswal resident of VillageSajour, P.S.- Sajour, District- Bhagalpur.

¶5

Kritya Nand Jha S/o- Surya Mohan Jha resident of Village and P.S.- Sajour, District- Bhagalpur.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur.

¶9

D.M. Bhagalpur.

¶10

The District Establishment Committee Bhagalpur through its Chairman Cum Collector, Bhagalpur.

¶11

The Establishment Deputy Collector Bhagalpur Collectorate, Bhagalpur.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shruti Sinha, Adv Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr.P.K.Verma (Aag3) Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 08-12-2023

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶17

counsel for the State are present.

¶18

The present writ petition has been filed for quashing of the Annexure-12 i.e. letter issued by Memo No. 15 dated 04.02.2019 by which the case of the petitioner has not been considered and kept in the new panel granting exemption with regard to upper limit of the age.

¶19

Counsel for the petitioners submits that in C.W.J.C. No. 5663 of 2017 vide order dated 10.12.2018, it was a

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.3259 of 2020(3) dt.08-12-2023 2/2

¶21

categorical direction in the order that if process of empanellment has started, the case of petitioners shall also be considered as per law. While considering the case of the petitioners, the authority shall consider whether the petitioners can be granted exemption with regard to the upper limit of the

¶22

age.

¶23

With this direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶24

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶25

Sunnykr/-

¶26

Shambhu Prasad Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shambhu Prasad Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandan Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar

Kumari Shanti Vs The State of Bihar

Narendra Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Ishteyaque Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Rai @ Lallu @ Ravindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vimla Devi Vs The State of Bihar