Patna High Court partly allowed petition to raise grievance under Bihar Rules 2019 for promotion status as Pradhan Lipik if sustained; dismissed writs for remaining petitioners as time-barred.
Petitioner No. 1 allowed to raise grievance under Bihar Rules 2019 for Pradhan Lipik status; other petitioners granted no relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2960 of 2020
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Subodh Kumar (AC to SC-26) For the AG : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad, Adv.
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
3 02-12-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel
for the State and learned counsel for Accountant General are
Patna High Court CWJC No.2960 of 2020(3) dt.02-12-2023 2/4
present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2960 of 2020(3) dt.02-12-2023 3/4
Patna High Court CWJC No.2960 of 2020(3) dt.02-12-2023 4/4
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Divyansh/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation dated 22.08.2019 filed pursuant to liberty granted in a previous writ petition was illegally rejected without considering the entire materials available on record?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kaushalya Devi
Priya Ranjan Prasad
Mano Ranjan Prasad
Most. Anjala Singh
Nand Kishore Yadav
The State of Bihar
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
