The Hon'ble Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, resulting in the dismissal of the matter as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition accorded; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2903 of 2019
======================================================
Brij Lal Kedia S/O-late Thakur Prasad Kedia R/O- Ambedkar Chowk, Ward no-21, P.O. and P.S. Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Ravi Bhushan Verma, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission accorded.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Jagdish/kiran/-
U
Brij Lal Kedia
The State of Bihar through The District Magistrate, Gopalganj
The Circle Officer Gopalganj
Nagar Parishad Through its Executive officer Gopalganj
The Executive officer, Nagar Parishad Gopalganj
Chandra Bhushan singh
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
