Writ petition dismissed for default as no one appeared for the petitioner and Registry defects, including non-filing of the second physical copy, remained unremedied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2858 of 2023
======================================================
M/s Jai Maa Sherawali Traders
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India & Ors.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the U.O.I. : Mr. Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG with Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr SC, CGST & CX ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 12-04-2023 None appears for the applicant-petitioner.
There is stated to be defects noted by the Registry, which
includes the second physical copy having not been filed.
The writ application is dismissed for default.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Rajkishore/ Shyam Bihari/-
U
M/s Jai Maa Sherawali Traders
The Union of India
K. Vinod Chandran
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
