Disposed

Umashankar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jul 2023CWJC/2824/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking directions to pay retirement dues disposed. No adjudication on substantive claims; order directs specific officials to follow statutory procedure within specified timelines.

What did the court decide?

Direct district magistrate to call Block Development Officer within four weeks to take final decision on retirement dues; ensure disciplinary action if officer fails to appear; pass reasoned order wit

Umashankar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2824 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Umashankar Pandey S/o Shiv Narayan Pandey, R/o Village- Sahopara, Churamanpur, P.S.- Churamanpur, P.S. - Buxar, District - Buxar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Buxar.

¶8

The District Development Commissioner, Buxar.

¶9

The Block Development Officer, Block - Nawanagar, District - Buxar.

¶10

The Block Development Officer, Rajpur, District - Buxar.

¶11

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhash, Adv., Mr. Raju Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr.Ajay ( Ga 5 ) For Accountant General : Mr. Dr. Anand Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH

¶14

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶15

Date : 17-07-2023

¶16

Heard Mr. Abhash and Mr. Raju Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr.Ajay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Dr. Anand Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks to file detail representation bringing on record all the evidence in support of his claim, before the District Magistrate, Buxar.

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.2824 of 2023 dt.17-07-2023 2/2

¶19

The District Magistrate, Buxar must call upon the Block Development Officer, Itari, Buxar with entire record relating to the petitioner and take a final decision with respect to payment of retiral dues, as claimed in the present writ petition, within a period of four weeks.

¶20

In case, the Block Development Officer, Itari, Buxar fails to appear before the District Magistrate, Buxar with all necessary documents relating to the petitioner, the District Magistrate must ensure to take disciplinary action against him for not obeying the directions of this Court.

¶21

The District Magistrate, Buxar must take a final decision after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law ensuring the payment of retiral dues admissible to the petitioner within a further period of two weeks.

¶22

With the above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶24

pravinkumar/-

¶25

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date
Transmission Date

Umashankar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umashankar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paras Kumar @ Paras Kumar Jha @ Pravin Kr. Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Murari Sah @ Murari Shah Vs the State of Bihar

Abha Devi @ Asha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shri Ranvijay Ram @ Ranvijay Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sushila Devi Vs The State of Bihar