A writ petition challenging suspension and charge-memo was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already obtained a dismissal order and filed an appeal, making further judicial intervention unnecessary.
None. The writ application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2657 of 2023
======================================================
Santosh Kumar Choubey, S/o Late Mahendra Choubey, Resident of VillageBaghipakar, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur, presently posted Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Patna District Police Force, Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhuvendra Kumar, AC to GP-5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
the petitioner's suspension order and charge-memo.
dismissal order has already been passed and he has availed the remedy of appeal.
of the writ petition, writ application has become infructuous and the same is dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SUMIT/-
U
Santosh Kumar Choubey
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Government of Bihar
The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Sardar Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna
The Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
