Dismissed

Puja Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Nov 2023CWJC/2407/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposes of a second writ petition regarding the delay in disposal of an election appeal. The court held that since a previous High Court order already fixed the time limit for disposal by the Appellate Authority, no fresh direction is required, and the petition is dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed on the ground that a coordinate bench had earlier fixed the time limit for disposal of the appeal.

Puja Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2407 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Puja Kumari daughter of Ram Chandra Kunvar, wife of Vinod Kumar, resident of Village- Malhipur, Police Station- Barauni, District- Begusarai.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The State of Bihar through the Princial Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Teacher Appellate Tribunal, Begusarai through its Presiding Officer.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Begusarai.

¶10

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Begusarai.

¶11

The Employment Unit Malhipur Gram Panchayat North, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai, through its Mukhiya.

¶12

The Panchayat Secretary, Malhipur Gram Panchayat North, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai.

¶13

The Head Master, Primary School, Malhipur, P.S.- Barauni, DistrictBegusarai.

¶14

The Head Master, Upgraded Middle School Vishnupur, Chand Barauni, P.S.Barauni, District- Begusarai.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No2 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1 (Sc13)

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 28-11-2023 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶21

The petitioner earlier filed a writ application,

¶22

bearing C.W.J.C. No. 16478 of 2021, which was disposed by a

¶23

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.04.2022.

¶24

In pursuance thereof the petitioner filed an appeal, bearing No. 18 of 2022, before the District Teachers Appellate Authority.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.2407 of 2023(2) dt.28-11-2023 2/2

¶27

present writ application has been filed for direction to the respondent No. 3 to dispose the appeal filed by the petitioner inasmuch as despite the specific order of the High Court to dispose the appeal within three months, the same is still pending as on the date of filing of the writ application.

¶28

In view of the fact that the High Court, while disposing the writ application of the petitioner earlier had fixed the time limit for disposal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority, no fresh direction is required to be issued in the present writ application, accordingly, the same is dismissed.

¶29

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶30

HarshPandey/-

¶31

Puja Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puja Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar NIrala Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Chandralok Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Ritesh Ranjan and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.