Dismissed

Kanchan Mala Bharti v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Dec 2023CWJC/2251/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Civil Writ Judge dismissed the petitioner's writ petition. Finding that Annexure-7, which formed the basis of her case, was not attached to the original form submitted, the Court held no case exists in her favour and quashed the matter.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as no case lies in favour of the petitioner due to missing Annexure-7.

Kanchan Mala Bharti Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2251 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kanchan Mala Bharti, Wife of Dr. Amit Ranjan, Resident of VillageAthgama, P.O.- Ghogha, P.S.- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur- 813205.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Chairman, Bihar State Staff Selection Commission, P.O. Veterinary College, Patna- 800014.

¶10

The Secretary, Bihar State Staff Selection Commission, P.O. Veterinary College, Patna- 800014.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Shankar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Prabhat Kumar- (AC to GA-11) For BSSC : Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Adv. ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶15

6 18-12-2023

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for

¶17

the State and learned counsel for the Bihar State Selection Commission are present.

¶18

Vide order dated 30.10.2023, this Court has ordered the Commission to verify from the original form that whether the petitioner has filed Annexure-7 with her form or she had filed any other document. It was directed that if the petitioner had filed Annexure-7 with her form, then in that case, the Commission shall come with the correct stand and for that two weeks time was granted.

¶19

Supplementary counter affidavit has been filed by

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.2251 of 2018(6) dt.18-12-2023 2/2

¶21

the Commission which is on record and from the said supplementary counter affidavit, it transpires to this Court that the Annexure-7 which is the basis of the case for the petitioner has not been attached with the original form by the petitioner at the time of submission of the form. The original form and its attached document has been attached vide Annexure-R4/D (page no.6 to page no.14) and Annexure-7 is not attached with the original form.

¶22

In this background, this Court has found that no case lies in favour of the petitioner and hence, with this observation, this writ petition is hereby dismissed.

¶23

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶24

Divyansh/-

¶25

Kanchan Mala Bharti v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanchan Mala Bharti v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arun Kumar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nathu Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Amrendra Kumar Ojha Vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Through Its Chairman and Ors.

Achin Lal Singh Vs Ram Chandar Raman

Meena Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.