Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking absorption of petitioners as instructors under the Non-formal Education Programme, holding that relief could not be granted after a Division Bench set aside a prior order directing reconsideration of similarly situated cases.
Writ application dismissed; no direction for absorption granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22132 of 2018
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Kant, Advocate Mr. Ravi Bhusan, Advocate Mr. Navin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Hari Mohan Mishra, AC to GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT
Patna High Court CWJC No.22132 of 2018 dt.04-10-2023 2/5
Date : 04-10-2023
Patna High Court CWJC No.22132 of 2018 dt.04-10-2023 3/5
respect of the instructors of the programme who were absorbed in regular Government service, similarly the respondents should identify the instructors who were validly appointed and issue orders for their absorption. The writ application was allowed.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22132 of 2018 dt.04-10-2023 4/5
cannot be denied the relief which is granted by the Court unless the relief is personal to the person. Taking this into account, the writ application was disposed of directing that the petitioner’s case would also require consideration by the respondents.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22132 of 2018 dt.04-10-2023 5/5
taking into consideration the order dated 5.7.2023 passed by the Division Bench allowing Civil Review no. 59 of 2018, in the opinion of this Court, no relief can be granted in the instant writ application and the same is dismissed.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
avinash/-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N/A |
| Uploading Date | 05.10.2023 |
| Transmission Date | N/A |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to relief for absorption in government service given the setting aside of a prior direction to consider similarly situated cases.
Whether the Division Bench order disposing of the earlier writ application bars the grant of relief in the instant application.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashwani Kumar & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.Referred¶25
Ashwani Kumar & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors. (AIR 1997 SC 1628) · Who else cites this
Anpurna Mishra and others
State of Bihar
Principal Secretary Education Department
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
