The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed a writ application for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite repeated calls, while the State counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21860 of 2011
======================================================
VINOD KUMAR GUPTA Son Of Sri Ramesh Prasad Gupta Resident Of Block Colony, Near Primary School, P.O. P.S.-Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr.Swapnil Kumar Singh, A.C. to G.P.-19 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
Despite repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of
the petitioner when the matter is called out.
However, learned counsel for the State is present.
In view of the above, this writ application is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U
Vinod Kumar Gupta
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
