Petitioner filed application for quashing an order regarding Jamabandi cancellation. Upon hearing, petitioner sought to withdraw the instant application following the final order in the underlying Land Tribunal case. Court disposed of the matter accordingly.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2178 of 2018
======================================================
Albela Yadav Son of late Ghar Bharan Yadav, Resident of Village-Fatehpur, Police Station Daraunda, District Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha- SC19 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
3 13-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In the instant application, the petitioner has prayed
for the following relief(s):
“That this application is being filed for issuance of writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions to the respondents for quashing the last part of the order dated 23.9.2017 passed by the Respondent No.3 in Jamabanmdi Cancellation Case No. 50/2015-16 by which Respondent No.3 directed the Circle Officer, Daraunda to send the file in the light of the order passed by the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Maharajganj and confirmed by the Commissioner, Saran without giving any reference regarding the B.L.T. Case No.228/16 pending before the Bihar Land Tribunal,
Patna High Court CWJC No.2178 of 2018(3) dt.13-03-2023 2/2
Patna and without any reason after rejecting the application filed by the Respondent No. 4 in a very casual manner he passed the last portion of the order which is apparently illegal and without jurisdiction and further for any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the instant application, final order has been passed in B.L.T. Case no.228 of 2016 by the learned Tribunal. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw the instant application to challenge the final order passed in the aforesaid B.L.T. case in accordance with law.
Without entering into the merits of the case, the instant application is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Saurabh/-
U
Albela Yadav
The State Of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Siwan
The Additional Collector, Siwan
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Maharajganj, District Siwan
The Circle Officer, Daraunda, District Siwan
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
