Brahmadeo Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Patna HC dismissed a writ petition under Art. 226 for default due to the consistent absence of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2149 of 2023
======================================================
Brahmadeo Yadav Son of Sri Lakhanlal Yadav, Resident of Village- Tulsipur, P.S.- Kharik, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
As such, writ petition stands dismissed for default.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Madhuresh Prasad, J)
aditya/- U
Brahmadeo Yadav
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar
The Collector, Bhagalpur
The Additional Collector, Bhagalpur
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Naugachhia, District- Bhagalpur
K. Vinod Chandran
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court