Dismissed

Kailash Chandra Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jun 2023CWJC/1889/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ relief as the District Appellate Authority at Madhubani was not functioning. With the authority now operational, he withdrew the application and was granted liberty to press his pending appeal, which the authority was asked to decide within six months.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to press pending appeal before District Appellate Authority, Madhubani; authority requested to decide appeal within six months.

Kailash Chandra Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1889 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kailash Chandra Jha Son of Baldev Jha Resident of Village- Navtol Behat South, Ward No.- 11, P.S.- Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

¶14

The Block Development Officer, Lakhnaur, District- Madhubani.

¶15

The Block Education Extension Officer, Lakhnaur, District- Madhubani.

¶16

Amit Kumar Son of Late Jhari Choudhary Resident of Village- Kilaghat Bajitpur, P.O.- Shubhankarpur, P.S.- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga, at Present working as Niyojit teacher in Girls Middle School Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani.

¶17

... ... Respondents

¶18

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramchandra Jha Raman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Amit Bhushan, AC to GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 20-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has moved this Court because the District Appellate Authority was not functioning at Madhubani. He has filed a case bearing No. 17/2022.

¶21

It is submitted that at this stage the District Appellate Authority is functioning, therefore, he would withdraw this writ

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.1889 of 2023(2) dt.20-06-2023 2/2

¶23

application to enable him to press the pending appeal before the District Appellate Authority, Madhubani.

¶24

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the

¶25

same.

¶26

This Writ Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to press his appeal which is said to be pending before the District Appellate Authority, Madhubani.

¶27

Let the District Appellate Authority, Madhubani consider the said appeal of the petitioner and all endeavours be made to decide the same preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order.

¶28

This Writ Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶29

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.)

¶30

Rajeev/-

¶31

Kailash Chandra Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Chandra Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Rai Vs State of Bihar

Suresh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Punj Teachers Training College Vs The State of Bihar

Bandana Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Hem Chandra Himkar Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Gupta, Vs The Block Development Officer