The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the challenge became obsolete due to the enforcement of the 2019 Rules and their 2021 amendment. No advocates appeared for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18772 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, A.C. to AAG-6. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
5 05-12-2023 The learned Government Advocate appearing for the State submits that subsequently the 2019 Rules have come into force which was also amended in the year 2021 and hence the challenge raised in the above writ petition has become infructuous.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
sanjeev/- ( Rajiv Roy, J) U
Vinod Kumar Singh and Anr
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
District Magistrate, Madhubani
Hon'ble the Chief Justice
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
