Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application due to lack of instructions from the client; court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1860 of 2018
======================================================
Mithilesh Singh S/o Shri Rajnath Singh, presently President of 'Gadh Devi' Vikas Samittee, R/o Village- Bikrampur, P.O.- Amnaur, P.S.- Marhowrah, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.1860 of 2018(2) dt.24-03-2023 2/2
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite
making best endeavors to contact the client for seeking instruction in the matter.
No instruction is coming forth and, as such, is not in a position to press the present writ application and thus seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present writ application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
HarshPandey/-
U
Mithilesh Singh
Bihar State Board Of Religious Trust
SATYAVRAT VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
