A writ petition was called on repeatedly with no one appearing for the petitioner to press the application. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17883 of 2015
======================================================
Md. Jalaluddin
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
On the last occasion also, nobody was representing the petitioner, however, the matter was adjourned. Today also nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls to press this writ application.
Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed for want
of prosecution on behalf the petitioner.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
brajesh/-
U
Md. Jalaluddin
The State Of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
