Dismissed

Bibi Farhana Begam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jan 2023CWJC/17650/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition under Art. 226. Relying on prior judgments (Suresh Ram, Minakshi), the bench held the petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy via appeal under specific Rules. Liberty was granted to file the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; liberty granted to file appeal under Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute Redressal & Appeal) Rules 2020.

Bibi Farhana Begam Vs The State of Bihar — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17650 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bibi Farhana Begam W/o Md. Shamshad Alam, resident of VillagePandarpur, Post- Rauta, P.S.- Rauta, District- Purnia.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Araria.

¶10

The District Education Officer, Araria.

¶11

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Araria.

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Jokihat, Araria.

¶13

The Block Education Officer, Jokihat, Araria.

¶14

The Mukhiya-cum- Chairman, Panchayat Teacher Employment Committee/ Panel, Gram Panchayat Raj- Bara Istambrar, Jokihat, Araria.

¶15

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj- Bara Istambrar, Jokihat, Araria.

¶16

Astan Parween, D/o Md. Shamim, W/o Md. Parwej Aalam, At and P.O.Bara Istambrar, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria.

¶17

The Secretary, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Araria.

¶18

... ... Respondent/s

¶19

======================================================

¶20

Appearance :

¶21

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suman Kumar Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.S.K. Ranjan, AC to GP XVII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

2 03-01-2023 The petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal in terms of the Rules of the Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute Redressal & Appeal) Rules 2020. In the judgment dated 23.02.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5489 of 2020 (Suresh Ram

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.17650 of 2022(2) dt.03-01-2023 2/2

¶25

Vrs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and connected matters reported in 2022 (2) B.L.J., 381 and the judgment dated 07.03.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 34 of 2022 (Minakshi @ Sushre Minakshi & Anr. Vrs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), this Court also held that the writ could not be maintainable in view of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner.

¶26

Granting liberty to the petitioner to file remedy as per Rules of the Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute Redressal & Appeal) Rules 2020, the writ petition is dismissed.

¶27

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)

¶28

Shamshad/Item No. 8

¶29

Bibi Farhana Begam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bibi Farhana Begam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Parasuram Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nishat Praveen Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ambedkar Institute of Higher Education Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Shishir Kumar Gautam Vs The State of Bihar