Dismissed

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Jul 2023CWJC/17338/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged rejection of claim for payment of dues by State Food Corporation, Patna via Order No.6298. Court noted respondent authority had paid some amount but disputed balance claim. Order declares writ petition disposed with direction to petitioner to approach the Registrar of Co-operative Department for appropriate decision.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; petitioner directed to appear before the Registrar of Co-operative Department, Bihar, in Bengal within four weeks with representation for grievance resolution.

Anil Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17338 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Anil Kumar Singh Son of Late Dwarika Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageDewaka Kaithi, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Managing Director, State Food Corporation, Patna Head Office, Patna.

¶8

The Deputy Manager, Legal, State Food Corporation, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Khagaria.

¶10

¶11

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Khagaria.

¶12

The Senior Deputy Collector-cum-Nodal Officer, Procurement of Surplus Paddy, Khagaria.

¶13

The Managing Director, Bihar State Co-operative Bank, Patna.

¶14

The Circle Officer, Chautham, Khagaria.

¶15

The District Manager-cum-Godown In-charge, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplier Corporation, Khagari

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sushil Kumar -GP-22 Mr. K.K. Singh, AC to GP-22 For Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Utkarsh Upadhyay, Advocate For Resp. No. 7 : Mr. Nishi Nath Ojha, Advocate ======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

7 17-07-2023 Heard the parties.

¶21

This is an application for issuance of appropriate

¶22

writ / writs, order / orders, direction / directions for quashing the order contained in Memo No.6298 dated 21.06.2018 passed by respondent Managing Director, respondent no.2 whereby and where under pursuant to direction / order passed by Hon'ble Court in CWJC No.9569/2017, petitioner submitted

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.17338 of 2018(7) dt.17-07-2023 2/3

¶24

representation regarding his claims being the chiarman of Kathi PACS and though contention of petitioner was noticed but by ignoring the admitted material facts such as paddy procurement receipt and details of members/farmers who supplied paddy to PACS though available with the petitioner but ignoring all these aspects respondent gave altogether wrong finding and rejected the claim of payment of admitted due amount of the PACS against admitted supply of CMR.

¶25

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2, 3,7 and 9 and it is important to bring on record paragraphs 9 and 10 which read as follows:

¶26

'9. That it is further stated and submitted that the respondent authority has already paid all amount against real/actual purchase paddy/supplied CMR to petitioner and Claim purchase paddy i.e. 1003.20 Quintal has not produce any evidence by petitioner, then balance claim CMR price not pay due to matter the issue over disputed.

¶27

10 That in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court order dated 06.08.2018 passed in LPA No. 881 of 2016 or statutory Remedy the petitioner raised claim before

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.17338 of 2018(7) dt.17-07-2023 3/3

¶29

Registrar Co-Operative department' Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the

¶30

light of the statement made in paragraph 10, he will be appearing before the Registrar, Co-operative Department, Bihar, Patna with his grievance so that he gets justice.

¶31

In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the Registrar, Co-operative Department, Bihar, Patna with his representation within four weeks from today.

¶32

The Registrar, Co-operative Department, Bihar, Patna shall take appropriate decision or refer the matter in the light of LPA No. 881 of 2016 decided on 06.08.2018.

¶33

The petition stands disposed of.

¶34

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶35

kiran/-

¶36

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Biranjan Kumar @ Viranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Shekhar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Jaimala Devi Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

Ismat Banow Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandra Kishore Thakur Vs The Bihar State Board Of Religious Trust Through Its Administrator and Ors.