In an oral order, the court noted that the petitioner informed the court that all retiral dues have been paid in accordance with the law. Consequently, the court held that the grievance was redressed and consigned the writ petition.
Grievance redressed by payment of retiral dues; writ petition consigned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1713 of 2023
======================================================
Sonamati Devi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the AG : Mr.Bindhyachal Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sarvesh Kr. Singh (AAG13) Ms.Sunita Kumari, AC to AAG 13
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 27-07-2023
Learned counsel files counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos.4 to 9 in the Court today itself. Let it be kept on record.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable where the petitioner claims that all retiral dues have been paid.
Sonamati Devi
The State of Bihar
Respondent nos.4 to 9
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
