Mahesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to appear even on the second hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16623 of 2013
======================================================
Mahesh Kumar Son Of Umashankar Singh Resident Of Mohalla - Vidya Nagar, Ward No.20, P.O. And P.S. Gopalganj, District - Gopalganj Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Manish Kumar Gp8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
2 16-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present even
in the second round.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
amit/-
Item no.36
U
Mahesh Kumar Son Of Umashankar Singh
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court