The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition as it was not pressed by the petitioner. The petitioner had sought relief regarding encroachments and unauthorized business activities but requested liberty to pursue alternative remedies.
The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16354 of 2010
======================================================
NANHKU CHAUDHARY S/O Late Dularchand Chaudhary R/O Vill.Rahmatganj, P.S.- Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar,Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raghwanand, GA-11 Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari,AC to GA-11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
5 13-03-2023 The present writ petition has been filed
seeking the following relief:-
"1.That this present application is being filed for removing the encroachment in premises of Dak Bungalow Road captured by the seller of vegetables and staying the motorbike by others in shelter of bad
Patna High Court CWJC No.16354 of 2010(5) dt.13-03-2023 2/2
elements of the society. As settlement of the said premises have been held in their names and they take bribe/market tax from the vegetable seller according to their sweet will without giving any receipts in which the public place is obstructed. The said premises have become the place of business and income without carrying the unauthorized place. And the same is continuing since 2006, despite ignoring the representations already served to the competent authorities of the State."
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law for redressal of his subsisting grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
kanchan/sonal- U
Nanпку Chaudhary
The State Of Bihar through Department Of Rural Development
The Director, Department Of Rural Development
The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Masaurhi
The Vice-Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Masaurhi
The District Magistrate, Patna
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
