Disposed

Nandu Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Jul 2023CWJC/15200/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking promotion to Branch Manager and monitoring benefits, noting his current dismissal and pending service appeal while granting liberty to agitate grievances upon success of that appeal.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to agitate grievances granted if service appeal succeeds; otherwise, the petition for promotion and monitoring benefits was dismissed.

Nandu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15200 of 2014

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Nandu Ram Son of Late Dukhi Ram Resident of Mohalla- Ram Raj Nagar, Karma Road P.O. and P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Secretary, Department of Co-operative, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶8

The Registrar, Co-operative Society, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Managing Director, District Central Co-operative Bank, Aurangabad.

¶10

The Board of Directors, District Central Co-operative Bank, Aurangabad.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madan Jeet Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sandeep Kumar, GA-8

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 13-07-2023

¶16

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-

¶17

“(A) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Respondents to promote the Petitioner on the post of Branch Manager from the post of Assistant as In-charge Branch Manager and consequential other promotions.

¶18

(B) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Respondents to give monitoring benefit to the Petitioner from his promotion has been due with appropriate interest.”

¶19

At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.15200 of 2014(2) dt.13-07-2023 2/2

¶21

respondents no.4 and 5 i.e. the District Central Co-operative Bank, Aurangabad, has submitted that the petitioner has already been dismissed from service and his service appeal is pending adjudication bearing Service Appeal No.83 of 2021.

¶22

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to agitate his aforesaid grievances, in case he succeeds in the appeal, filed before the respondent authorities. Liberty so sought is granted.

¶23

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶24

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶25

Saurav/-

¶26

Nandu Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandu Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Alaham @ Alaham Miya Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Mohan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sajid Hussain Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ved Prakash Singh and Ors. Vs The Chairman And Managing Director Central Bank Of India and Ors.