Disposed

Mamta Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Apr 2023CWJC/1493/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Civil Writ Jurisdiction matter, the Patna High Court refused to pass a direct order for transfer. Instead, it granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation with the competent authority to consider the transfer under the Government's policy.

What did the court decide?

Granted liberty to file a fresh representation for consideration of the transfer petition within six weeks.

Mamta Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1493 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mamta Kumari, Wife of Shravan Kumar, Awas Board, Ranco, Ward No.- 3, Khagaria, Police Station Muffasil, District- Khagaria.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director-in-Chief (Nursing), Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Araria.

¶10

The Incharge Medical Officer, Referral Hospital Jokihat, District- Araria.

¶11

... ... Respondents

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aditya Nath Jha, AC to SC-18 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 20-04-2023

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer in the light of the Government’s policy. The petitioner is said to have completed more than 3 years at the present place of posting.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner may file a representation in this regard with the competent authority which may be looked into in accordance with the policy of the Government.

¶18

Having regard to the submissions noted hereinabove, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation with the Director-in-Chief (Nursing) Health

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.1493 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2

¶20

Services, Government of Bihar (respondent no. 3) within a period of six weeks from today.

¶21

If such representation is filed, the same will be considered by respondent no. 3 in accordance with the Government’s policy, without discrimination and by maintaining uniformity in similar cases.

¶22

This writ application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶23

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶24

SUSHMA2/-

¶25

Mamta Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamta Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanoj Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Gautam Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chameli Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Nutan Kumari Vs The State of Bihar