The High Court at Patna dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was unavailable on two dates.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1477 of 2018
======================================================
Sanjida Khatoon D/o Mhd. Falahuddin, R/o Village-Dhokrahan, P.S.-Ram Nagar, Distt.-West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.C.Mishra, SC 16
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
petitioner was not available and today also in the second round the learned counsel for the petitioner is not available.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Suraj/-
Item No. 56
U
Sanjida Khatoon D/o Mhd. Falahuddin
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
