Dismissed

Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jul 2023CWJC/1434/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition challenging an order under Section 4(1)(Gha) of the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 was held premature as the matter is appealable before the Commissioner under Section 14. The petitioners were directed to approach the Commissioner instead of approaching the High Court.

What did the court decide?

Directing that the petitioners move before the Commissioner as provided under Section 14 of the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009.

Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1434 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary Son of Late Parasnath Tiwary Resident of Mohalla- Kotwali, Ward No.- 13, P.S.- Battiah Town, District- West Champaran.

¶4

Avinash Kumar Son of Late Banti Prashad Mehta Resident of Mohalla Ujjain Tola, Ward No.- 35, P.S.- Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

¶5

Syed Istyak Ahmed Son of Mustaque Ahmed Resident of MohallaChawani, P.S.- Manuapul, District- West Champaran.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principla Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

¶10

¶11

The District Magistrate, West Champaran.

¶12

The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran, Bettiah.

¶13

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Narkatiyaganj, District- West Champaran.

The Circle Officer, Gaunaha, District- West Champaran.

¶18

The Revenue Officer, Gaunaha, District- West Champaran.

¶19

The Anchal Amin, Gaunaha, District- West Champaran.

¶20

Iftekhar Ahmad @ Munna Tyagi Son of Late Mustafa Resident of MohallaHardiya Narkatiyaganj, Ward No.- 21, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

¶21

Md. Prince Son of Asfaque Ahmed Resident of Mohalla- Hardiya Narkatiyaganj, Ward No.- 21, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

¶22

... ... Respondent/s

¶23

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC-19

¶24

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 03-07-2023

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶26

learned counsel for the State.

¶27

The present writ application has been filed by the petitioners for setting aside the order dated 26.09.2022 passed in

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.1434 of 2023 dt.03-07-2023 2/3

¶29

Case No. 06 of 2022-23 by Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran (Respondent No.4) preferred under Bihar Land Disputes Resolutions Act, 2009 under Section 4(1)(Gha).

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the land in dispute was happened to be the Khatiyani land of Ganesh Prasad having Zamabandi No. 157 which was running in the name of Ganesh Prasad. Counsel further submits that petitioners have acquired title through Ganesh Prasad in whose name zamabandi continued and this aspect has completely been ignored and case has been decided against them.

¶31

Learned counsel for the State submits that it is admitted that the petitioners have filed this application under Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, under Section 4(1)(Gha), which is appellable before the Commissioner under Section 14 of the said Act. He further submits that this writ petition is not maintainable here and fit to be dismissed on this ground alone.

¶32

After going through the submissions and record of the case, it is clear as per the argument that the present writ petition has been filed against the order passed by Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran entertained under Section 4(1)(Gha) of the Act. It is also correct

¶33

Patna High Court CWJC No.1434 of 2023 dt.03-07-2023 3/3

¶34

that order passed by the Land Reforms Deputy Collector under Section 4(1)(Gha) is appellable under Section 14 before the Commissioner of the said Pramandal.

¶35

In this view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the present writ petition is premature and hence, petitioners are directed to move before the Commissioner.

¶36

With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off.

¶37

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶38

ravishankar/-

¶39

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Sundar Prasad (Advocate) Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Ray Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mira Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Smt. Malti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Yugeshwar Singh Vs The Union of India