Dismissed

Pammi Kumari @ Pammi Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Apr 2023CWJC/1394/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the selection of a respondent as an Anganwadi Sevika. The court held that the 2019 guidelines provide an efficacious remedy of appeal and accordingly dismissed the writ with liberty to appeal.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of with liberty to prefer an appeal before the competent authority under the 2019 guidelines.

Pammi Kumari @ Pammi Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1394 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pammi Kumari @ Pammi Devi Wife of Sri Vijay Rai, Daughter of Sri Satya Deo Pandey, Resident of Village- Babhnauli, Ward No.-8, P.O. Rampurwa Bazar, P.S.- Govindganj, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Annexe Building-4, Old Secretariat, Patna800015

¶7

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Indira Bhawan, West Boring Canal Road, Sri Krishnapur, Patna- 800001

¶8

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari- 845401

¶9

The District Programme Officer, East Champaran at Motihari- 845401

¶10

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Areraj, East Champaran at Motihari- 848411

¶11

The Chairman, Selection Committee-cum-Block Development Officer, Areraj, East Champaran at Motihari- 845411

¶12

The Child Development Programme Officer Areraj, East Champaran at Motihari- 845411

¶13

The Secretary-cum-Lady Supervisor Areraj, East Champaran at Motihari845411

¶14

Smt. Priya Kumari Wife of Sri Ravi Ranjan Pandey, Resident of VillageBabhnauli, P.O.- Rampurwa, Ward No.- 08, District- East Champaran at Motihari at Present posted - Sevika at Anganwari Centre Code No. 180, Babhnauli, East Champaran at Motihari.

¶15

... ... Respondents

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhishek Singh, AC to GA-7

¶18

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 26-04-2023

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶21

petitioner has moved this Court challenging the proposal of selection of respondent no. 9 on the post of Aganwadi Sevika. It is stated that respondent no. 9 has already been selected.

¶22

Learned counsel for the State submits that under the 2019 guidelines for the selection of Sevika/Sahayika, the

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.1394 of 2023(2) dt.26-04-2023 2/2

¶24

petitioner has a remedy of appeal.

¶25

In view of the availability of an efficacious remedy of appeal under the 2019 guidelines, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the competent authority under the 2019 guidelines.

¶26

This writ application is accordingly disposed of with liberty as prayed for.

¶27

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶28

SUSHMA2/-

¶29

Pammi Kumari @ Pammi Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pammi Kumari @ Pammi Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maharudra Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Rima Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sindhu Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raju Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar @ Sanjay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Sarvesh Patel Vs The State of Bihar