In a civil writ petition challenging state and commission actions, the High Court at Patna noted counsel's submission that the grievance was redressed. Consequently, finding the writ application had become infructuous, the court dismissed the petition.
Writ application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1322 of 2022
======================================================
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nasral Hoda, SC-1 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SUMIT/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is infructuous in view of the redressal of the petitioners' grievance.
Priyanka Mehta
Vipin Kumar Sharma
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Resources Department, Government of Bihar
The Bihar Technical Service Commission
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
