Disposed

Kashi Nath Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2023CWJC/1291/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this written order, the High Court observed that the petitioner's departmental appeal against punishment had remained pending for several years due to inordinate delay by the Appellate Authority. The Court directed the concerned authority to consider and dispose of the appeal with a reasoned order within two months if it was still pending, before dismissing the writ application.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Appellate Authority to consider and dispose of the pending departmental appeal with a reasoned order within two months of receiving the order.

Kashi Nath Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1291 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kashi Nath Jha, Son of Late Digambar Jha, resident of Village - Tharhi, P.S. Andhratharhi, District - Madhubani.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Joint Director, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Regional Dy. Director of Health, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

¶11

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief, Medical Officer, Madhubani.

¶12

The Deputy Superintendent, Sub-Divisional Hospital, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.

¶13

... ... Respondents

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner : Mr.Kripa Nand Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to GA-10

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 25-04-2023

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶21

2. The petitioner in the present case has prayed for the

¶22

following reliefs:-

¶23

“(i) For issuance of an appropriate direction, order or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 28.06.2006 passed by the Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna, whereby and whereunder the punishment of stopping two annual increment with cumulative effect has been awarded and further the petitioner shall not get any-thing except the subsistence allowance, which was paid to him during the suspension period.

¶24

(ii) For further commanding the respondents to alternatively pass the order in his pending appeal, which is pending before the Commissioner-cum-

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.1291 of 2023(2) dt.25-04-2023 2/3

¶26

Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna (herein after referred to as Appellate Authority) against the order of punishment dated 28.06.2006.

¶27

(iii) For any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioners is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶28

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a departmental appeal vide Annexure ‘10’ of the writ application as back as on 07.09.2006 but the said appeal is still pending consideration. It is stated that during pendency of his department appeal, the petitioner has retired from service on 30.11.2020.

¶29

4. Learned counsel for the State submits that he has presently no instruction as to the pendency of the departmental appeal but in case such an appeal is pending, an appropriate direction may be issued to the Appellate Authority to consider the same and pass a reasoned order.

¶30

5. Having regard to the nature of the submissions recorded hereinabove, this Court is of the considered opinion that if the appeal as contained in Annexure ‘10’ has remained pending for all these years and no order has been passed till date, it would be a case of inordinate delay on the part of the Appellate Authority in considering the appeal of the petitioner.

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.1291 of 2023(2) dt.25-04-2023 3/3

¶32

6. This Court directs that in case the appeal is still pending, the same be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶33

7. Respondent No.1 with whom the appeal is said to

¶34

be pending be informed accordingly.

¶35

8. This writ application stands disposed of

¶36

accordingly.

¶37

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶38

lata/-

¶39

Kashi Nath Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kashi Nath Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jag Narayan Ojha Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Prasad Samayar, Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Maharudra Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Rima Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sindhu Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.