Disposed

Arvind Kumar v. Punjab National Bank

Patna HC6 Dec 2023CWJC/12697/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ to appoint him as Part Time Sweeper in Punjab National Bank after interview but no OBC appointment. Court dismissed writ directly, directing petitioner to file appropriate representation to bank authorities instead, to be considered within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Ordering petitioner to file appropriate representation before respondents/Bank authorities for consideration within four weeks.

Arvind Kumar Vs Punjab National Bank — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12697 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Arvind Kumar Harihar Thakur R/o Village-Mirchak, P.O.-Gurua, P.S.-Gurua, Dist-Gaya.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Punjab National Bank through Regional Manager, Regional Office, R Block, Patna.

¶7

The Circle Head, Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank, Ray Kashi Nath Road, Swarajpuri Road Gaya.

¶8

The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Gurua, Gaya.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 06-12-2023 Heard counsel for the parties.

¶14

This writ application has been filed by the

¶15

petitioner to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on permanent vacant post of Part Time Sweeper (PTS) as per advertisement issued by the bank dated 31.03.2018 for which petitioner appeared in the interview, but till date no appointment was done though two seats for OBC category is still kept vacant.

¶16

It is specifically contended by the learned counsel for petitioner that he appeared before respondent no. 2 for

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.12697 of 2023(2) dt.06-12-2023 2/2

¶18

interview and after verification of the certificates and attending the interview, seven persons were appointed under General category and two seats under OBC category were kept vacant. Challenging the action of respondent, the petitioner has filed this writ application.

¶19

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Punjab National Bank contended that a representation may be filed by the petitioner before the Bank authorities who shall consider and pass appropriate and reasoned order.

¶20

Taking into consideration the fact that no representation was made by the petitioner before the Bank authorities, this Court directs the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the respondents/Bank authorities who shall consider his representation and pass appropriate order within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of the representation.

¶21

With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶22

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)

¶23

vinita/- U

Arvind Kumar v. Punjab National Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Kumar v. Punjab National Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rekha Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Paswan Vs The Union of India

Narayan Verma Vs The Union of India

Golu Kumar Vs The Union of India

Dhanjit Das Vs The State of Bihar

Bachchu Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar