In this writ jurisdiction case, the court disposed of the petition applying mutatis mutandis the directions from Pallavi Kumari Vs. State of Bihar. The petitioner sought ACP benefits, higher qualification salary arrears, and interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11797 of 2015
======================================================
Nagesh Kumar Jha Son of late Ugra Narayan Jha Resident of Village -Kanhauli, Post Office, P.S. and Block Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anand Kr Ojha, Advocate Mr. Ram Narayan Mahto, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, GP-26 Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 21-02-2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has prayed as under:-
“1. That, this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to the respondents to give the benefits of A.C.P. to the petitioner and also give the salary of higher qualification as B.A. from the date of junior person who has got the same. On the ground, petitioner had appointed on post of Assistant Science Teacher on 11.01.1974 in
Patna High Court CWJC No.11797 of 2015 dt.21-02-2023 2/4
the Middle School Rahua, Sangram under Block Madhepur, District Madhubani and who has superannuated on 31.07.2013 from the post of In-charge Head Master and after giving the abovementioned benefits further give the direction to the respondent to pay the salary since 1989 to 2013 with 18% interest per annum as Intermediate Science whatever petitioner had got the same since 1974 to 1989 and who has filed several representations before authorities which is pending.”
“8. Keeping in view above, it is directed that the salary of the teachers shall not be withheld on excuses as above and arrears of salary shall also be released. Fund in this regard shall be made available by the Education Department to the concerned employment units for the purpose of payment. It is made clear that if the arrears are not released within a stipulated period of four months from today, the teachers would be entitled to receive interest on the arrears of the amount of
Patna High Court CWJC No.11797 of 2015 dt.21-02-2023 3/4
salary at the rate of nine per cent. The interest amount shall be recoverable from the respective District Education Officers/ District Programme Establishment Officer.
9. If the salary/arrears of salary are not released, the concerned teacher would also be entitled to file an appeal before the respective District Appellate Authority. If such an appeal is preferred, the same shall be decided expeditiously within a period of three months. If required, the District Appellate Authority/State Appellate Authority would be also empowered to impose penalty in terms of Rule 16 of the Rules of 2020 which provides as under:
“ 16. Power to impose Punishment:-
In case of non-compliance of the order/direction or in case of any complaints by the party for compliance of the order:-
(i) The Appellate Authority shall impose punishment against-concerned party but he will be given adequate opportunity of hearing before imposing punishment.
(ii) The Appellate Authority may impose penalty upto Rs. 50,0001/- (Fifty thousand only) upon the answerable party. The amount of penalty shall be deposited in the Treasury under the head indicated by the Department. The amount of penalty shall be recoverable by way of Public demand.
(iii) The Appellate Authority shall have jurisdiction to make recommendation to the concerned Department to initiate Departmental proceeding or to take necessary action against the delinquent employee under the provisions of Bihar Service Code/Bihar Panchayat Raj Act 2006/Bihar Municipal Act 2007 and other relevant provisions.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.11797 of 2015 dt.21-02-2023 4/4
held to be applicable in the present case mutatis mutandis .
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Amrendra/Item No. 33
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 24.02.2023 Transmission Date
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner entitled to salary benefits and higher qualification salary as per analogous judgment.
Whether directions applicable in preceding judgment regarding salary arrears and interest apply to present petitioner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pallavi Kumari Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.Followed¶21
C.W.J.C No. 22186 of 2019 (Pallavi Kumari Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nagesh Kumar Jha
State of Bihar
District Magistrate, Madhubani
District Education Officer, Madhubani
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
