Uday Kant Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed for payment of salary was withdrawn by the petitioner during the hearing. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10799 of 2015
======================================================
Uday Kant Chaudhary S/o- Late Yugeshwar Chaudhary, R/o VillageDhakajari, P.O.- Andhara, P.S.- Andhara Thadhi, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Namrata Singh, AC to GA-12 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
“1. That this is an application for issuance of direction/directions, order/orders in the nature of mandamus or other appropriate writ/writs for commanding the respondents authorities for making payment of Salary from the period of 01.10.2001 to 31.7.2006.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.10799 of 2015(2) dt.18-08-2023 2/2
present writ petition, to which the learned counsel for the respondent-State has got no objection.
stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
S.Sb/-
U
Uday Kant Chaudhary
The State of Bihar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court