“On the consideration of the entire evidence, as adduced by the plaintiffs as well as the defendants as referred above, it has been fully proved that the suit property remained in possession of the plaintiffs, and their ancestors since ‘Jaith 1328 Fasli’. The plaintiffs have been coming in its possession for a period of more than several 12 years. The defendants had the knowledge of the possession of the plaintiffs over the suit property and these plaintiffs remained in possession of the suit property in exercise of their right, claiming the suit property as belonging to them. Thus, the plaintiffs by their consistent and up-interrupted possession over the suit property, for a period of several 12 years, adverse to the defendants, have acquired valid title to the suit property on the basis of their adverse possession. Neither the defendant no.1 nor the defendant no.2 was ever in possession of the suit property. They have got no title to the suit property, and, thus, these defendants have got no title to the suit property, and, they have also not been in possession of the suit property. All these points are thus disposed of accordingly.
