The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed a criminal writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the applicant's reliance on a specific paragraph of the counter affidavit rendered the application moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.99 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2018 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur
======================================================
SHEELA MAHTO W/O LATE RAJENDRA PRASAD MAHTO R/o villageGerawadi, P.S.- Kodha, District- Katihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, AC to GP 4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the
light of the statement made in paragraph 29 of the counter affidavit, this application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-
U √ T √
Sheela Mahato
The State of Bihar
The Director General of Police, Bihar
The Additional Director General of Police, Bihar
The Dy. Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Division
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Samastipur
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
