The petitioner filed a writ petition pressing no case. The court observed that no one appeared for the petitioner and presumed loss of interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2378 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-477 Year-2017 Thana- BANKA District- Banka
======================================================
Rashmi Shikha D/o Late Binod Kumar Jha, Resident of Village- Laudhiya, P.O.- Madhodih, P.S.- Sangrampur, District- Munger At present- Working as In Charge Head Master, New Primary School, Mainbaran, Banka- Block, District- Banka.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra SC 16
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
This case is of the year 2017. When the matter is
called out, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Therefore, it seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Harsh/
U
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2378 of 2017(2) dt.07-04-2023 2/2
Rashmi Shikha D/o Late Binod Kumar Jha
The State Of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
