Dismissed

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sharma v. the State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Dept. of Homes, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Patna HC12 Dec 2023CR. WJC/1677/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted withdrawal of a criminal writ application seeking quashing of an FIR, subject to a condition allowing the petitioner to revive the remedy if settlement fails.

What did the court decide?

Permit withdrawal of the writ application with liberty to approach the Court again if the settlement fails.

What the court decided

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sharma Vs the State of Bihar through… — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1677 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2022 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sharma Son Of Bhola Sharma Resident Of Village- Rupaspur, Ias Colony, Near A.V.N. English School, Ps- Rupaspur, Dist- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Dept. Of Homes, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Bihar

¶8

The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar

¶9

The Superintendent Of Police, Gaya, Distt- Gaya Bihar

¶10

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Gaya Sadar, District Gaya Bihar

¶11

The S.H.O. Rampur, District Gaya Bihar

¶12

Sanni Kumar Son Of Sitaram Yadav Resident Of Village- Ganga Bigha, Po And Ps- Rampur, Distt- Gaya

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Virendra Kuar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar AC to GP-4

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 12-12-2023 Let the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State be

¶21

taken on the record.

¶22

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶23

State.

¶24

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that presently the matter is being discussed for a settlement between the parties, therefore, he is seeking to withdraw this application with liberty that in case the settlement does not take place and the occasion so arises, the petitioner may avail his remedy for

¶25

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1677 of 2023(2) dt.12-12-2023 2/2

¶26

quashing of the FIR.

¶27

4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the withdrawal of the writ application with liberty as prayed for.

¶28

5. In the circumstances, this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

¶29

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶30

arvind/-

¶31

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sharma v. the State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Dept. of Homes, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sharma v. the State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Dept. of Homes, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Home Depatment, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Bihar State Power Generation Co. Ltd. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shami Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

R (Virtual Name) Md. Rizwan Vs The State of Bihar

Chandrashekhar Azad Vs the Union of India through Ministry of Rural Development, Krishi Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road