The petitioner in Criminal Revision No.176 of 2022 was granted permission to withdraw the application, which was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission accorded to withdraw the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.176 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar
======================================================
Aniket Kumar @ Shiv Kumar @ Ankit Kumar @ Shivam Kumar S/o Rakesh Singh R/o Village- Ratanpur, Piprahi, P.S.- Piprahi, District- Sheohar. under the guardianship of Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar (father of petitioner) R/oWard No.- 3 Ratanpur, Piprahi, P.S.- Piprahi, District- Sheohar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER
3 13-01-2023
After short arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/revisionist prays to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/pooja-
U
Aniket Kumar
State of Bihar
Chandra Shekhar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
