Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal revision petition as he had already been acquitted by the trial court. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.111 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2019 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya
======================================================
Vishal Kumar@ Rohit Kumar Son of Suresh Yadav Resident Of MohallaAmwa, P.S.- Bodhgaya, Dist.- Gaya Through His Father/Legal Guardian Namely Suresh Yadav Ad Litem.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
parties.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner/revisionist seeks permission to withdraw this present criminal revision petition, as petitioner/revisionist has already been acquitted by the learned Trial Court.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present criminal revision petition is
dismissed as withdrawn, having become infructuous.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
pooja/-
U T
Vishal Kumar@ Rohit Kumar (through father/legal guardian Suresh Yadav)
The State of Bihar
Chandra Shekhar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
