The High Court at Patna granted the petitioner's request to withdraw Criminal Revision No. 1002 of 2017 and subsequently dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the criminal revision application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.1002 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
Vijay Pandit, S/o Late Parshuram Pandit, R/o Village- Gopalpur Bairakh Verma Colony, Ward No. 15, Panchayat Parihari, P.S.- Raniganj, DistrictAraria.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 01-12-2023 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This revision application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
SUSHMA2/-
U
Vijay Pandit
The State of Bihar
Indrani Devi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
