Allowed

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 May 2023CR. MISC./9438/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous application, the Patna High Court directed the enlargement of the petitioner, Kundan Kumar, on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties in a trial case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9438 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2022 Thana- MANIYARI District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kundan Kumar Son Of Baidnath Sah @ Baijnath Sah R/V- Muraul, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Maniyari, P.O.- Basauli, District- Muzaffarpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mazharul Hassan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 03-05-2023

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 355 of 2022 dated 31.10.2022 registered for the offence punishable u/s 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, three miscreants boarded on a motorcycle started fleeing away but one miscreant was apprehended by the police. On being asked, the apprehended person disclosed his name as the petitioner Kundan Kumar and

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9438 of 2023(2) dt.03-05-2023 2/2

¶14

also disclosed the names of the co-accused persons as Manish Kumar and Abhinandan Sah who fled away. On search, a loaded country-made pistol and a motorcycle were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2022.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 355 of 2022.

¶18

The application stands allowed.

¶19

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶20

atul/-

¶21

U T

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyajeet Gaurav @ Ghanti Vs The State of Bihar

Jitan Nat Vs The State of Bihar

Kishan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kuishi Devi @ Kunti Devi @ Kushyi Devi @ Khushechi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vikas Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bullet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar