Allowed

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jan 2023CR. MISC./9309/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court issued anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 384 and 34 of the IPC. The bail was granted subject to conditions including appearance and furnishing a bond with a surety.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail upon arrest/surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties.

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9309 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-797 Year-2021 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU Son of Ganesh Yadav Resident of Village - Mahendru , P.s.- Pirbohore and Distt.- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madan Mohan Adv : Mrs.Pallavi Pandey Adv : Mr.Rahul Raj Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Singh APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

8 17-01-2023

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶11

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 384 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with the other accused persons entered the flat of the informant and told him to vacate it as rangdari . Thereafter, on 20.07.2021 when the informant reached his flat, he found that his lock was broken and his name-plate was removed and the petitioner along

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9309 of 2022(8) dt.17-01-2023 2/3

¶14

with the other accused persons had put his new lock on the door of the flat in order to occupy it illegally. The said flat bearing no. 201 was purchased by the petitioner from the builder.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is about 45 days delay in lodging the FIR against the petitioner. No offence is made out against the petitioner under Section 384 of the IPC. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the material available in the case diary, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/(Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 797 of 2021, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a following condition:-

¶18

The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9309 of 2022(8) dt.17-01-2023 3/3

¶20

This application stands allowed.

¶21

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶22

niku/-

¶23

U T

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar @ Pappu @ Vikash Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Yadav @ Shiv Kumar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Sitaram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raees Ahmad @ Md. Raees Quraishi @ Raees Kuraishi Vs the State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vicky Ram @ Vikky Kumar Vs the State of Bihar