Petitioners withdrew the criminal miscellaneous application permitting future grounds at charge framing stage; application dismissed.
Withdrawal allowed with liberty to raise grounds at charge framing; Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9028 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2015 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nawal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Pd.App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw this application with liberty
to the petitioners to raise all the grounds at the stage of framing of charge.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Ranjeet/-
U T
Alok Ranjan @ Alok Kumar Srivastava and Anr
The State Of Bihar
Shailendra Kumar Chaudhary
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
