Allowed

Siken Mandal @ Sikendar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Oct 2023CR. MISC./8975/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband facing arrest in a dowry torture complaint case under Section 498(A) IPC sought anticipatory bail. The court granted bail upon arrest or surrender within thirty days, with conditions including trial co-operation, no tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two like sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Siken Mandal @ Sikendar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8975 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2426 Year-2019 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SIKEN MANDAL @ SIKENDAR MANDAL S/O MAHESH MANDAL Resident of village- Bhatotar, Ward No.- 10, P.O.- Bhatotar, P.S.- Barhara Kothi, District- Purnea.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

SONI DEVI D/O YOGENDRA MANDAL, W/O SIKEN @ SIKENDRA MANDAL Resident of village- Koshi Sharan Devottar, P.S.- Banmankhi, District- Purnea.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 09-10-2023

¶12

Heard Mr.Jitendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with C.A. No.2426 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of IPC.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner and other coaccused persons is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8975 of 2023(4) dt.09-10-2023 2/4

¶17

petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the complaint petition is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint petition. Further submits that from a bare perusal of the complaint petition as well as the statement of the victim which was recorded under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. which suggests that the complainant is living with her inlaws and she wants to live with her husband. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it appears from the impugned order that the mediation between the parties has failed before the learned court below itself and the complainant is not ready to live with the inlaws’ house and the petitioner is not in a position to live with the complainant at the place of his job.

¶18

Learned counsel for the complainant as well as the learned APP for the State, on the other hand, have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the complainant is still ready to live with the petitioner, who is husband of the complainant, but the petitioner wants to live with the complainant in his inlaws.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner,

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8975 of 2023(4) dt.09-10-2023 3/4

¶21

above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with C.A. No.2426 of 2019 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

¶22

(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶23

(II) If the petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8975 of 2023(4) dt.09-10-2023 4/4

¶26

for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶27

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶28

Nitesh/-

¶29

U T

Siken Mandal @ Sikendar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siken Mandal @ Sikendar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalita Devi @ Lalita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Shatrughan Kumar @ Shatrudhan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jyoti Kumari Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Arman Ali Vs The State of Bihar