Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a restoration application. The court granted the permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the restoration application was granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8960 of 2023
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79355 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2018 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui
======================================================
GANESH YADAV Son of Tarani Yadav @ Tulsi Yadav R/V- Fatepur @ Dhwana , Nawadih Silphari , Chakai P.S- Chandramaridih Simultala, DistJamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shree Niwas Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Murli Dhar, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
3 05-04-2023 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this restoration application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
divyanshi/-
U T
Ganesh Yadav
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
