Allowed

Md. Imtiyaj Alam @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Dec 2023CR. MISC./82803/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench order granting permission to correct a clerical error in a petition and anticipatory bail application regarding the district of jurisdiction. The court directed correction of 'Araria' to 'Supaul' and extended six weeks for surrender.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to correct petition; Anticipatory bail order modified; six weeks time granted for surrender; incorrect district name corrected.

Md. Imtiyaj Alam @ Sonu Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82803 of 2023

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64394 of 2023

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- Supaul

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Md. Imtiyaj Alam @ Sonu, Male, aged about 26 years, S/O Md. Najivullah, R/O Village- Mohanpur Katahar, P.S- Chhatapur, Distt.- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 15-12-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

¶13

make necessary correction in paragraph no.1 of the petition.

¶14

Permission is granted.

¶15

Let the same be done in course of the day.

¶16

At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶17

the matter is taken up for hearing.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶19

This modification application has been filed for modification of the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023 by which the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 82803 of 2023(2) dt.15-12-2023 2/3

¶22

to inadvertence ‘SDJM, Araria’ was typed in place of “SDJM, Supaul” in paragraph no.1 as well as in prayer portion of the Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023 and the same mistake has occurred in the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023 by which the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail.

¶23

Perused the record.

¶24

Perusal of the records shows that at the time of feeding of data of Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023 as well as the instant application, name of the district has been entered wrongly as “Araria” in place of ‘Supual’. Perusal of the record further shows that the case relates to Supaul district and not the Araria district. Accordingly, office is directed to make necessary correction in the data of both the cases with regard to name of the district.

¶25

In such view of the matter, in the last but one line of 6^th paragraph of the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023, in place of ‘SDJM, Araria’, it should be read as “SDJM, Supaul”.

¶26

The order dated 17.10.2023 stands modified to the aforesaid extent.

¶27

As prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, further six weeks’ time with effect from today is

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 82803 of 2023(2) dt.15-12-2023 3/3

¶29

granted to the petitioner to surrender in the Court below in terms of the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023.

¶30

Since the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023 has been communicated to Araria district due to wrong entry of the name of district, office is directed to communicate the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64394 of 2023 to the SDJM, Supaul, at once.

¶31

The application stands allowed.

¶32

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶33

J. Alam/-

¶34

U T

Md. Imtiyaj Alam @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Imtiyaj Alam @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bibi Hasina Vs Abdul Barkat

Rajendra Prasad Sinha Vs Executive Officer

Rajendra Prasad Sinha Vs Md Shakil Hassan

Krishnadeo Prasad, Vs Shambhu Sharan Verma

Mohan Chaudhary Vs Barun Chaudhary and Ors.

Shree Kishun Rai Vs Pan Kuwar