Allowed

Arman Jha @ Aman Kumar @ Aman Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2023CR. MISC./79591/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral bail order, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged with offences under Sections 379 and 356 IPC arising from an allegation of snatching a gold chain, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Arman Jha @ Aman Kumar @ Aman Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79591 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-365 Year-2023 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arman Jha @ Aman Kumar @ Aman Jha S/O Manoranjan Jha @ Buchhu Jha Village-Mathurapur, Ps. Khagaria, Dist. Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 08-12-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khagaria (C.N.) P.S. Case No. 365 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 356 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

It is a case of snatching of gold chain weighing about 18 to 20 grams of the informant by the accused persons.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner, petitioner has not put on test identification parade and petitioner is not named in the FIR. Petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79591 of 2023(2) dt.08-12-2023 2/2

¶17

is in judicial custody since 12.06.2023.

¶18

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail

¶19

of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that petitioner is in judicial custody for about six months, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (C.N.) P.S. Case No. 365 of 2023.

¶21

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶22

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶23

U T

Arman Jha @ Aman Kumar @ Aman Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arman Jha @ Aman Kumar @ Aman Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parwati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rashid Vs the State of Bihar

Dhanai Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Paswan @ Abhishek Kumar @ Chhotu Vs The State of Bihar

Keshav Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar