Petitioner sought withdrawal of petition against interim maintenance order as main case concluded. Court held the petition became infructuous and dismissed it.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7599 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
Tajbir Alam Son of Mumtaz, Resident of Village- Chanamana, P.S.- Pothiya, District- Kishanganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Khare, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5 21-12-2023 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition in view of the conclusion of the main maintenance case before the Ld. trial court because this petition has been preferred against the interim order. In view of disposal of the main maintenance case, the interim order no longer survives.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
perwez
U T
Tajbir Alam
State Of Bihar
Jainab Begum
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
