The High Court dismissed an application for bail in a case involving possession of a pistol and live ammunition under the Arms Act, citing recovery of evidence and prior criminal antecedents.
Prayer for bail rejected and trial directed to conclude within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75661 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2023 Thana- SHAHKUND District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
MITHUN YADAV @ BIKKY YADAV SON OF CHULHAI YADAV@ CHULHAY YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KASBA KHERHI, PSSHAHKUND, DISTT- BHAGALPUR
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
ORAL ORDER
2 01-12-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75661 of 2023(2) dt.01-12-2023 2/2
incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
S.Katyayan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail should be allowed given the recovery of weapons and presence of criminal antecedents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MITHUN YADAV @ BIKKY YADAV
The State of Bihar
RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
