Petitioner sought withdrawal of his application in a Gaya complaint case following a compromise between the parties. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7537 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2014 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya
======================================================
UPENDRA NATH SINGH Son of Birja Singh @ Brij Nandan Singh R/vGere, P.S.- Mofassil, District- Gaya, At present Mohalla- Mallah Toli, Rewar Toli, Ishwar Chaudhary Path, Manpur, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prashant Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 11-04-2023 Heard the parties.
In view of the compromise between the parties,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to
withdraw this application.
Permitted to be withdrawn.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Saif/-
U T
Upendra Nath Singh
The State of Bihar
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
