Dismissed

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Prajapati v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 May 2023CR. MISC./75313/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a robbery case under IPC Section 394. The court held the prayer was not inclined to be granted, though surrendered within six weeks, the court would consider regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail rejected; liberty to surrender within six weeks to seek regular bail.

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Prajapati Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75313 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2022 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RITESH KUMAR @ RITESH KUMAR PRAJAPATI Son of Ram Sudhar Prajapati Resident of village - Mujan, P.S.- Mohania, District - Kaimur (Bhabua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 01-05-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No.104/2022, registered for the offence punishable u/s 394 of the IPC.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants snatched the bag of the informant by creating terror by firing. The bag contained gold, silver ornaments and Rs.45,000/-.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He is not named in the F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He has been made

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75313 of 2022(2) dt.01-05-2023 2/2

¶16

accused in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He has two criminal antecedent.

¶17

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that petitioner along with other co-accused persons have robbed the money and jewellery of the informant on the point of pistol.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

¶19

This application is accordingly dismissed.

¶20

However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

pallavi/-

¶23

U T

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Prajapati v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Prajapati v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Ranjan @ Guddu Mahto@Shashi Ranjan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Bibhanand @ Kumar Bibhanand Poddar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kamat Vs the State of Bihar

Prem Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Jwala Rai @ Jwala Ray Vs The State of Bihar